April 6, 2009 at 7:41 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: nato, politics
A diplomat of the United Nations stated that the expansion of NATO will put world peace in danger.
Hans Christof von Spneck, an active diplomat in the United Nations and a critic of NATO warned about the expansion of NATO in an interview.
He also said in a German University that NATO is a threat to many countries right now. This threat creates reaction and the more that this organization grows the more danger it will present.
April 6, 2009 at 7:28 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: pakistan, politics
A suicide bomber went into a crowded Shia center in northern Pakistan killing at least 35 and injuring 150 others.
Unidentified men entered the Shia center Imampur of Islamabad causing explosions that killed 35 Shia Muslims and injured 150 others.
This suicide bomb occurred while people were in a session of mourning (azadari).
There were over 1500 people present and the explosion occurred near the door of the center.
Moments after the explosion the police came and the injured were taken to medical facilities.
Nobody has taken responsibility of the attack but the terrorist organization Sipah Sahaba, a major branch of the Taliban, has attacked Shia centers in northern Pakistan before.
April 6, 2009 at 7:15 am (Uncategorized)
Three policemen have been killed in Pennsylvania putting fear into American’s hearts about a security crisis. In this case a 23-year-old man named Richard Poplawski lost his job and then fired at three policemen resulting in their deaths. This event happened one day after people were killed in an immigration center in New York. In that case, a person by the name of Jiverly Wong killed 13 people before committing suicide.
The possibility of a security crisis occurring in America increases with these two events. A number of such events have occurred after the financial crisis started in the summer of last year – all stemming from unemployment and poverty. For instance, at the end of January a person in Los Angeles killed his wife and five children after losing his job and before committing suicide. A few days later in Alabama a person killed ten people for the same reason. The repetition of these events shows that the American society is on the verge of anarchy stemming from the financial crisis. Zibigniew Brzezinski, a former advisor to Jimmy Carter, warned last month that America will see security problems. Therefore, in conditions where 600 thousand people loose their jobs every month joining the lines of unemployment the numbers of people who are loosing their homes are increasing. When they become homeless the chances of them becoming violent are greater. Statistics show that the percentage of unemployment in America has reached 8.5 percent and in some states this number has surpassed ten percent. It is predicted that this number will be two figures throughout America by the end of the year. The American government implemented strategies last month in order to combat the financial crisis and create job opportunities. They have not worked so far.
April 5, 2009 at 5:51 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: imam khomeini, iran, islam, islamic leadership, khomeini, politics, religion, walayatul-faqih, waly al-faqih
Conditions of Leadership
By: Imam Khomeini
The conditions that a leader must have directly stem from the nature of the Islamic government. After general conditions, such as sanity, there are two foundational conditions which are:
When differences arose after the Noble Prophet (s) as to who would take on the responsibility of the caliphate there was no difference of opinion in whether the future leader must have merits. The only difference was in regards to which person had those merits.
Since the Islamic government is a government of laws it is necessary for the leader to know what those laws are – as has been mentioned in traditions. It is not only necessary for the leader to have this knowledge but anyone who has some sort of position must have this knowledge as well. But, the leader must have the most knowledge. Our imams used this to reason for their imamate – they would say that an imam must be better than the rest of the people. The criticisms that Shia scholars give are also in this regard where they say that so and so asked the ruling from the caliph who was unable to answer him and therefore the caliph is not suitable for caliphate. They also say that the caliph performed such and such action that was in opposition to Islamic law and therefore he is not suitable for caliphate.
Knowing the law and being just are foundational pillars for Muslims. Nothing else has as much importance, for instance knowledge about the angels, knowledge about the attributes of Allah, none of these matter in the issue of imamate. If one has knowledge about all fields of science and has discovered all of the laws of nature or is an amazing musician he will not become more suitable for leading an Islamic government than one who has knowledge about the law and is just. That which is related to caliphate and that which was discussed in the age of the Prophet (s) and the imams (a) and that which is certain amongst the Muslims is that the leader or the caliph must know Islamic laws and must be just in theological and ethical matters. Intellect denotes this as well because and Islamic government is a government of law – not a free-flowing government or a government clinging to the whims of an individual. If the leader does not know the law he is not suitable for leadership because if he follows someone the strength of the government would be broken and if he does not follow someone he would not be able to implement the law. The tradition: “Jurists rule over sultans” is certain. If sultans followed Islam they would have to follow jurists – they would have to ask the jurists what the law would be in various cases and how to implement it. In this case the real leaders are the jurists and that is why they must officially take control of the government and not give it to someone who is forced to follow them because they are ignorant of the law.
Of course, it is not necessary for general workers to know all Islamic laws and become jurists. Rather, it is enough for them to know the laws that are in relation to their work; it is enough to know their duties.
This was the case in the time of the Prophet (s) and the Commander of the Faithful (a). The leader must have these two merits, but their representatives and other workers who are sent to other lands must know the laws that are in relation to their work.
A leader must be perfect in theological beliefs and ethics. He must be just. He must not be polluted by sin. A person who wants to implement divine punishments in their correct places; a person who wants to take control of the public treasury; a person who Allah gives power over his servants must not sin. “My pledge does not reach the oppressors.”
If a leader is not just he would not act just in giving Muslims their rights, obtaining taxes, spending the money obtained from taxes correctly, and implementing divine punishments. It is possible that he would place those close to him over the society and spend the public treasury to his own benefit. (Walayat al-Faqih, p.58-61)
The door of ijtehad must always be open in an Islamic government. The nature of a revolution and a government dictates that ijtehadi opinions must be freely given – even if they oppose one another. Nobody should have the right to prevent this. But, what is important is correctly understanding governance and the society in which, according to them, the Islamic system can make plans for the benefit of Muslims. It is here that the term ijtehad used in the Islamic seminary is not enough, rather if a person is the most knowledgeable in regards to the sciences taught in the Islamic seminary but is unable to recognize what is in the best interest of the society or is unable to recognize righteous people from non-righteous people he would not have a political vision and would not have the ability to make correct decisions. This person is not a mujtahid in social or government matters and cannot become the leader of the society. (Sahifah Nur, v.21, p.47, 1988, Tehran)
Dear Shaykh Ali Mishkini:
After greetings, you wanted my viewpoint in regards to the constitution. Whatever the people in charge thought was correct act in accordance to it. I will not intervene – except in the matter of leadership. We cannot leave our Islamic country without a leader. We must choose someone who will defend the honor of Islam in the political world.
At the beginning I believed and insisted that the condition of being a marja’ is not necessary. A just mujtahid who is confirmed by the Khobregan and is respected throughout the country is enough. If the people vote for the Khobregan so that they determine which just mujtahid is suitable for leadership then his acceptance is the acceptance of the people. In this case he will be chosen by the people and his governance will be established.
I said this in regards to the constitution, but our friends insisted on the condition of being a marja’ and because of that I accepted. I knew at that time that this will not be applicable in the near future. (Sahifah, v.21, p.129, 1989, Tehran)
April 4, 2009 at 10:44 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: israel, politics, spain
A number of human rights activists wanted a judge in Madrid to look into the bombings of Gaza in the year 2002. This movement was stopped.
The Israeli air force bombed Gaza in July, 2002 with a one-ton bomb resulting in the deaths of 14 and injuries of 11.
The lawyers against the case stated that since Israel has taken on the responsibility of investigating what happened this case should be closed in Spain.
It is worth mentioning that almost all of the Israeli leaders are accused of committing crimes in this case.
April 4, 2009 at 9:42 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: imam khomeini, islam, khomeini, politics, religion
By: Imam Khomeini
At the same time that Islam orders man to worship and at the same time that Islam shows man how to worship, it tells man how to live and how his relationship with other humans must be. Islam even tells us how an Islamic society must deal with other societies. There is no action or movement from an individual or a society that does not have a ruling in Islam. Therefore, it is clear that the concept of an Islamic leadership and being religious encompasses all facets of the society because Islam takes the responsibility of guiding a society in all of its dimensions. (Sahifah Nur, v.4, p.167-168, 1978, Paris)
Islam is not something that only looks at one side of an issue. Islam has rulings on all sides of all issues – all of the issues relating to the world, relating to politics, relating to the society, relating to economics, and relating to everything which the people of the world do not know about. Monotheistic religions came to glance at both sides of the issue; to devise a plan which would be implemented by both sides. It is not the case that it only deals with one side while the other side is left ambiguous. Islam is especially this way – more than the other religions. [The two sides are referring to matters of this world and matters of the hereafter] (Sahifah, v.9, p.137, 1979, Langarud)
The Glorious Quran which is in the hands of the Muslims is the same as it was from the beginning of Islam to now; one letter has not been added to it or taken away from it. When this Quran invites people to ponder it does not mean that they should sit in their homes and remember Allah; to remember Him in private. The issue is a social issue, it is an invitation to politics; an invitation to governance and at the same time all of these issues are acts of worship. Worship was not separated from politics and social benefits. In Islam, everything which has been encouraged has a spiritual dimension, even working in factories, farming on farms, teaching in schools – all of these are in the benefit of Islam and have spiritual dimensions. (Sahifah, v.18, p.275, 1984, Tehran)
Islam’s ethical rulings are also political. The ruling that is in the Quran which states that Muslims are brothers to one another is an ethical ruling, a social ruling, and a political ruling. If the members of the various tribes that have become Muslim believe in Allah and the Prophet they are brothers. In the same way that brothers love each other, all groups must love each other. In addition to this being one of the huge Islamic ethical and in addition to it having huge ethical results it is also a huge social ruling that has huge social results. (Sahifah, v.13, p.23, 1980)
It can be said that, without exception, all of the divine encouragements, even in personal matters and even in issues regarding one’s relationship with Allah, have a social and political dimension to them. (Sahifah, v.18, p.274, 1984, Tehran)
If you were able to understand the meaning of religion in Islamic culture you would clearly see that there is no contradiction between religious leadership and political leadership. Rather, just as political struggles are part of one’s religious duties leading political movements is part of the responsibility of religious leaders. (Sahifah, v.4, p.167, Paris, 1978)
The slogan that religion and politics are separate is one of the propagational aspects of the occupational forces who want to keep Muslims away from deciding their own destiny. In Islamic law political and social issues are discussed before matters of worship. The Prophet’s methods in regards to internal and external political issues show that one of the great battles of the Prophet (s) was a political battle.
The martyrdom of the Commander of the Faithful (a) and Hussayn (a) as well as the imprisonment, torture, and poisoning of other imams (a) was all on the path of Shia political battles against oppressors. In one word: fighting and political activity make up an important part of religious responsibility. (Sahifah, v.4, p.33, 1977, Paris)
April 3, 2009 at 6:53 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: argentina, palestine, politics, zionism
The people of Argentina held protests against Zionism on the Palestinian ‘Land Day.’ They defended the rights of Palestinians while standing up to the Zionists.
Thousands of people in Argentina protested in front of the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires while chanting anti-Zionist slogans.
One of the protestors said: “The Argentinean people are unified with the Palestinians in their struggle. We will defend their rights until their land is freed.”
33 years ago the Zionist forces killed many Palestinians who stood up trying to defend their land. This day has been named the ‘Land Day’ in Palestine and Palestinians recognize it every year.
This year other countries joined in protest.
April 3, 2009 at 6:36 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: america, economy, politics, unemployment
According to a report by ADP, the number of people who lost their jobs in March surpassed 742 thousand.
The American company ADP announced: “The numbers of Americans who lost their jobs in March surpassed 742 thousand. This increase was astonishing and surpassed all predictions.”
The economists all predicted that the number of people who would loose their jobs would be less than the 697 thousand who lost their jobs in February – they were wrong.
Economical analyzers added that the scale of unemployment in this country is predicted to surpass ten percent by the end of the year. This is a huge hurdle that Obama has to overcome and that he will not be able to overcome.
April 3, 2009 at 6:13 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: castro, cuba, fidel castro, g-20, politics
Cuba’s revolutionary leader criticized the G-20 Summit because poor countries were absent in it.
Fidel Castro stated in an article written about the G-20 Summit in London: “180 countries were not present in this summit and the destiny of billions of people are dependant on the agreement made there.”
The former president of Cuba also emphasized that large industrial countries are facing huge contradictions between each other and even internally.
Castro added: “The Summit in London has started while huge economical contradictions and ideologies are complicating the international scene.”
The revolutionary leader of Cuba also criticized the media coverage of the summit. He recently said that the people of the world have the right to know about the financial crisis of the world.
April 1, 2009 at 6:11 am (Uncategorized)
Tags: america, bush, hugo chavez, isreal, perez, politics, venezuela
The president of Venezuela demanded that an arrest warrant for the former president of the United States and the Zionist regime because of the crimes that they committed.
Hugo Chavez, the president of Venezuela, spoke to reporters while entering a hotel in Doha, the capital of Qatar. He condemned the decision of the international courts to issue an arrest warrant for Umar al-Bashir, the president of Sudan. He considered it as an act of judicial terrorism and disrespect for the third world.
Chavez entered Doha to participate in a conference of 22 Arabic countries and 21 Latin American countries. He asked the question: Why do they not issue the arrest warrants for George Bush and Shimon Perez?
abunakhli
zaynabnour
Huqul al-Nakhl 